Several clients, several codebases, one plan
This is the shape Falrow was built for first. Each client application records its own stack and repository, each customer carries its own meetings and follow-ups, and a developer moving between them never has to explain the project to an agent again.
The parts of the workspace you actually touch
An application per build
Website, web app, CRM, mobile app, API, MCP server or internal tool, each with its database, hosting, functions, frontend, backend and git repository on record, and its own ticket-type owners.
The customer behind the ticket
Customers link to the applications you build for them. Open a customer and see every project; open a ticket and see the meeting it came from and who it is for.
Cycles per client, not one for everyone
Recurring schedules per project as well as per workspace: 1 to 56 days with a cooldown, up to 12 planned ahead, rolled over after a review or automatically.
The agent knows which client it is in
A developer opens a client repository and asks for the plan. The git remote decides which application, which stack and which open tickets come back, so there is no chance of working from the wrong client's backlog.
Work arrives from somewhere, and goes somewhere
One workspace means the handover is a link between records rather than a message asking someone to copy something across.
Reviewed action items become tickets on that client's application
A forecast date you can send without hedging
The right plan, matched from the git remote
There is no client portal, no time tracking and no invoicing. Clients do not log in; you send them what the reports say.
We would rather you read that here than find it out in week two.
Every claim above is one of these, seen from this angle.
Bring agencies onto the same plan
We are opening workspaces to a few teams at a time. Tell us what you build and who needs to see it, and we will set it up with you.